VirusKeeper and antivirus scanners comparative

Most antivirus sofware uses scanning technology that detects known viruses from a virus definition file. The limits of this outdated method are clearly visible with the advent of new viruses like myDoom, Sasser, Bagle. Millions of computers were contaminated by these virus though most were "protected" by an antivirus scanner.

These scanners have numerous disadvantages : they need constant updates (which require a subscription fee), they hog system resources and slow down the computer and the user is required to manually initiate virus scans. Viruses are then only detected once they are already on the computer !

Antivirus scanners are also unable to protect the computer against newer threats like spyware and Internet Explorer attacks.

The table below compares VirusKeeper with standard antivirus scanners:

	Antivirus  scanner	VirusKeeper
Memory usage	30 MB to 180 MB	< 12 MB
CPU usage	5 to 15%	< 3%
Frequency of updates required	Daily	Monthly
Cost of updates	about $30 / year	FREE
New virus detection	NO	YES
Real time spyware detection	NO	YES
Browser protection	NO	YES
Registry protection	NO	YES
Cost (single user license)	between $45 and $75	$29.95

VirusKeeper's advanced technology uses fewer system resources and ensures full protection against viruses, spyware, Internet Explorer attacks and other new threats.